Graduates through their mortat boards in the air after US President Barack Obama delivered the commencement address at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan, May 1, 2010. ; Credit: JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images
It's a commonly held belief in the education reform community that educators should be encouraging all students to attend college and preparing them to succeed at traditional universities.
Research shows that those with a college degree earn significantly more over the course of their careers than non-degree holders and getting a well paying job without a degree is getting harder.
But what happens when a student is not "college material"? Are we doing students harm by pushing them down the traditional college route when many of them are destined to fail?
According to research from Georgetown University, less than 10 percent of poor children now graduate with a four-year college degree. With improvements in K-12 education, it's possible that the number could double down the road but large numbers of students will still be left without a degree in hand.
A lack of well paying vocational jobs makes the path to the middle class even bumpier for many young Americans. Some students may not fare well in college but without strong reading and math skills above the high school level their prospects may be even worse.
Should the traditional college track still be considered the ideal for all American students? Are we providing enough 'non college' alternatives that also provide a path to the middle class? Are we shortchanging our students by not emphasizing the need for strong reading and math skills, even in vocational tracks?
Guest:
Michael Petrilli, Executive Vice President of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, a prominent education reform think tank
RiShawn Biddle, editor of Dropout Nation and co-author of ‘A Byte at the Apple: Rethinking Education Data for the Post-NCLB Era’.