Quantcast
Channel: AirTalk | 89.3 KPCC
Viewing all 9870 articles
Browse latest View live

TED2013 Talk: Why your twenties matter

$
0
0
Dr. Meg Jay

Dr. Meg Jay, psychologist that works primarily with clients in their 20s, spoke at TED 2013 about 30 not being the new 20 and how to make the most out of being 20-something. Credit: Jen Fariello

During TED 2013, clinical psychologist Dr. Meg Jay determined to inspire young adults to realize one thing—make your twenties count. In her speech, she spoke on this “defining” decade being the basis for marriage, family and a career. Instead of “sliding” into situations and relationships, Jay says 20-somethings should live their lives in a deliberate and meaningful way. She likens these years to an airplane and how even slightly veering off-course changes the destination.

With relationships, Jay believes in not wasting time in the dating game and discourages cohabitation. As for career-searching in a difficult economy, she hopes 20-somethings will network and begin to establish their careers because the 20s affect their future wages.

Do you agree? Are Jay’s comments reflective of your experience? Is Jay putting too much pressure on 20-somethings or is she underestimating them? Also, what positive and negative experiences in your 20s have influenced your life today?

Guest:
Meg Jay, Ph.D, psychologist that works primarily with clients in their 20s; TED 2013 speaker; author of “The Defining Decade: Why your twenties matter—and how to make the most of them now”


Are Newport Beach's fire pits a public good or a nuisance?

$
0
0

Should fire rings near residential areas be removed? Credit: California Coastal Commission

If you grew up in or around the beach cities of Orange County, it’s likely you spent a long, fun evening with family and friends huddled around a fire in a fire pit near the Balboa Pier, or across the mouth of the Newport Harbor in Corona Del Mar. One of the last vestiges of the pre-litigious days of post-World War II beach culture, the eight-inch high concrete pits have been a cheap, popular way to spend summer and fall evenings for more than half a century, but they could be in danger of removal.

The city counsel of Newport Beach has voted to get rid of the pits, and the California Coastal Commission is reviewing the city’s request for a permit to remove them in San Diego today.

Newport Beach city councilwoman Nancy Gardner said on AirTalk that health concerns are the primary motive at play, citing a recent South Coast Air Quality Management District rule that imposed a ban on wood-burning fireplaces in newly constructed homes.

"Their study showed that the particulate matter was harmful to people's health," said Gardner, a claim she says was verified by the director of pulmonary services at Hoag Hospital in Irvine, Calif.

While the counsel argues the fires can contribute to health problems of beach-goers and local residents alike, many of those with fond memories of the pits are opposed to their removal. Those opposed claim that beachfront residents are using health risks as a scapegoat to conceal their concerns about beach-crowding and rowdy behavior. Gardner refuted such suggestions of ulterior motive.

"We still have lots of visitors that never use the fire rings and they still come to our beaches," she said.

Jack Wu, a Newport Beach resident and columnist for the Orange County Register, is opposed to the rings' removal. He says that the Coastal Commission can only refer to anecdotal stories about reduced air quality in the areas surrounding the fire pits, and that no empirical data exists to prove residents' claims that the beach fixtures pose a health hazard.

"The city has not actually measured the air quality on or around the beaches," Wu said. Gardner believes that such measurements would be redundant.

"We don't need to do a study to see that the smoke is affecting the residents there," she said. "Until a few years ago, we didn't know that this was a health hazard -- not just a nuisance that you didn't want to sniff." 

Should the city be permitted to remove the pits to protect the interests of people who bought a home near these beaches, or are the good times the pits provide from residents all over the county a greater good?

Guests:
Nancy Gardner, Newport Beach city councilwoman

Jack Wu, Newport Beach resident and columnist for the Orange County Register

Is allowing small knives and golf clubs on commercial planes a good idea?

$
0
0
US-POLITICS-ECONOMY-BUDGET

Starting on April 25th the TSA will allow small knives and certain sporting equipment as carry-on luggage on domestic flights. Credit: JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images

The events of September 11, 2001, changed everything about air travel. Since that day, flyers have endured sometimes obvious and other times mystifying restrictions on the kinds of items allowed on flights. Yesterday, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) made the surprising announcement that starting April 25th domestic flights will conform to international rules and allow certain small knives and items like hockey sticks, golf clubs and pool cues be permitted carry-on items.

Boy Scouts and passengers intent on bringing their favorite 9-iron on vacation may breathe a sigh of relief at the soon-to-be relaxed regulations, but coalitions and unions that represent flight attendants aren’t so pleased. “While we agree that a passenger wielding a small knife or swinging a golf club or hockey stick poses less of a threat to the pilot locked in the cockpit, these are real threats to passengers and flight attendants in the passenger cabin,” said Stacy Martin, president of the Transportation Workers Union that represents flight attendants for Southwest Airlines.

Do you think small knives and certain sporting equipment should be allowed on commercial airplanes? Are these items security risks? Will this give TSA more time to screen for explosives?

Guests:
Kelly Skyles, National Safety and Security Coordinator for Association of Professional Flight Attendants (APFA) and representing the flight attendants of American Airlines; has been a flight attendant with American Airlines for 26 years.

Robert Poole, Director of Transportation Policy at Reason Foundation; author of the study “Toward a Risk-Based Aviation Security Policy”
 

Election results and analyzing exit poll results

$
0
0
Mayoral Election Held In Los Angeles

Candidate in the Los Angeles City mayoral race, Councilman Eric Garcetti and his wife Amy Wakeland cast their ballots at Allesandro Elementary School on March 5, 2013 in Boyle Heights area of Los Angeles. Credit: Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images

Redux is one word to sum up yesterday’s primary election. The mayoral race between City Councilman Eric Garcetti and City Controller Wendy Greuel will head to a May 21 runoff, with Garcetti getting 33 percent and Greuel locking in 29 percent of the vote.  

Voter turnout for the mayoral primary was pretty dismal. Just 16 percent of registered voters showed up at the polls, lower than four years ago. The battles for the city attorney and city controller posts, as well as multiple seats on the LAUSD, will also be decided again in May.  Los Angeles voters weren’t too hot on Measure A, the half-cent sales tax increase to ease the city’s budget deficit, which got voted down 55 percent to 45 percent.

The extra money would have gone toward 911 emergency response services, senior services, after-school gang and drug prevention programs, among other things. We will look at the election results and what the city is going to do to try to fix its budget problem now that Measure A is off the table.

Guests:
Frank Stoltze, KPCC Reporter

Fernando Guerra, Professor of Political Science and Director of the Center for the Study of Los Angeles, Loyola Marymount University

Miguel Santana, City Administrative Officer at City of Los Angeles
 

The complicated legacy of Hugo Chavez

$
0
0
VENEZUELA-CHAVEZ-DEATH-FUNERAL-CORTEGE

The flag-draped coffin of Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez was borne through throngs of weeping supporters today as it made its way to the Military Academy in Caracas. Credit: JUAN BARRETO/AFP/Getty Images

Venezuelans are stocking up on goods fearing destabilization in the country. The death of longtime leader Hugo Chavez yesterday may have left a leadership vacuum.

Chavez was one of the most powerful figures in South American history. He was famous and infamous for nationalizing Venezuela's vast oil wealth. He used those profits to improve life for many of the country's poor. Nevertheless, he failed to manage its ballooning profits. The global price of a barrel of oil sky-rocketed during his presidency, but Venezuelans became increasingly reliant on the export. Most notable in this country was Chavez's outspoken criticism of America's influence on the South America. He called then President George W. Bush a donkey and the devil. Chavez also closely allied with now deceased Cuban President Fidel Castro.

The future of both Cuba and Venezuela is uncertain today. The vice president of Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro, is ready to succeed Chavez, despite the constitution specifying that the interim presidency should be assumed by the speaker of the National Assembly. Things could already be off to a shaky start as Chavez's body lies in state.

How severely could Venezuela change after Chavez? Why was he such a polarizing figure? What type of relationship should the U.S. have with Venezuela?

Guest:
Miguel Tinker Salas, Professor of Latin American History and Chicano Latino Studies at Pomona College in Claremont, California. He is also the author of “The Enduring Legacy: Oil, Culture and Society in Venezuela.”

Christopher Sabatini, Senior Director of Policy at the Americas Society and Council of the Americas (AS/COA) and founder and editor-in-chief of the hemispheric policy magazine Americas Quarterly (AQ)

Good, gunning and game across America

$
0
0
Gun Guys: A Road Trip

Author Dan Baum joins Larry to talk about his new book, "Gun Guys: A Road Trip," where Baum journeys through America to find out what people really think about guns. Credit: Gun Guys: A Road Trip cover

Author Dan Baum is a self-professed Democrat and gun lover. While that combo seems like oil and water in an era of partisan stands on the 2nd Amendment, Baum argues that appreciation of guns is not as polarizing as the media might have us believe. To prove his point, he set out on a road trip across the United States to discover what America’s gun culture really looks like.

Baum was the kind of kid a bully might pick on as a boy, but at camp in the Catskill Mountains, he found out he was a good shot, and guns found their place in his life from there on. His road trip was an attempt to square blue-state America’s image of gun rights advocates with red-state America’s image of liberals who want to disarm law-abiding citizens. While driving from city to city and town to town, he parses the numbers and language surround a culture that, in the wake of Newtown and Aroura, has found its way into the center of our national political conversation.

Guest:
Dan Baum, author of “Gun Guys: A Road Trip”

Of filibusters, drones, extrajudicial powers, Holder and Paul

$
0
0
Rand Paul Leads Senate Filibuster Against Brennan Vote

U.S. Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) is seen on a TV monitor as he participates in a filibuster on the Senate floor March 6, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Along with opposing the nomination of John Brennan to be the next director of CIA, Paul spoke at length about drones. Credit: Alex Wong/Getty Images

Senator Rand Paul - a Republican with strong Libertarian leanings - led a nearly 13-hour filibuster in the U.S. Senate yesterday. He began during proceedings to confirm John Brennan as CIA Director, but Paul's protest had a different target. Myriad times during the hours-long filibuster he asked President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder to address extrajudicial killings of American citizens.

Paul cited the death of the American-born son of Anwar Al-Awlaki. Both were men, U.S. citizens , were killed in separate drone strikes in 2011. Lawmakers have been dealing with the controversial issues of domestic drones, targeted killings and presidential powers. However, the politics are unpredictable. Some of Paul's fellow Republicans helped keep the bluster going during the filibuster, but voters are more accustomed to Democrats keeping a check on civil liberty issues.

What was Paul protesting yesterday? When can the U.S. target alleged American terrorists overseas? When can the U.S. use drones in American territory? Was the filibuster effective?

Guests:
Stephen Vladeck , Professor of Law; Associate Dean for Scholarship at American University Washington College of Law; he was part of the legal team that successfully challenged the Bush Administration's use of military tribunals at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006); last week, Vladeck testified before the House Committee on the Judiciary on the subject of presidential powers and drones.

John Bellinger, partner at Arnold & Porter in Washington DC.   He served as the Legal Adviser for the National Security Council and for the Department of State [under Condoleezza Rice] during the Bush Administration; last week, Bellinger testified before the House Committee on the Judiciary on the subject of presidential powers and drones.

Can the Navy train in SoCal waters without harming whales?

$
0
0
Environmental Groups Challenge Navy's Use Of Sonar In West Coast Training Exercises

Bottlenose dolphins swim ahead of the bow of a boat off the southern California coast on January 30, 2012 near Dana Point, California. Credit: David McNew/Getty Images

Tomorrow, the California Coastal Commission will hear details of underwater exercises proposed by the U.S. Navy Pacific Fleet. The Navy wants to increase the number of training activities off the coast of Camp Pendleton and San Diego.

Environmental advocacy groups warn that sound waves of sonars cause deadly harm to marine mammals. The fight over the issue has gone on for years. In 2008, the Ninth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals ruled against the Navy's use of sonar, but later the Supreme Court overturned that decision. The Navy says it mitigates against harm by keeping watch for whales, then pausing testing as necessary. Environmental groups say it's impossible to watch for whales at night or to protect against the millions of sonar strobes and detonations.

A few months ago, the California Coastal Commission rejected a request for offshore seismic testing proposed by Pacific Gas & Electric. The board said PG&E could not go ahead without minimizing environmental impacts.

What's the best way to minimize harm while maintaining military readiness?

Guests:
Michael Jasny, Director, Marine Mammal Project, Natural Resources Defense Council

Alex Stone, Environmental Program Manager, U.S. Pacific Fleet


Are laws not enough to stop people from using cellphones while driving?

$
0
0
TEXTING 2009

Using a cellphone while driving is banned in California, but it's not enough to stop some texters and callers. Should all phones be disabled in moving cars? Credit: Photo by Lorianne DiSabato via Flickr Creative Commons

California has banned driving while using a hand-held cellphone since July 2008. But really, how many times have you seen drivers tapping feverishly in his or her iPhone at a red light, or worse, while they are driving on the road? It’s not only a source of frustration for other drivers, it has proven deadly.

Experts at the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis have calculated that cellphone-distracted drivers have caused over 300,000 injuries and over 2,500 deaths per year. And researchers from the University of North Texas Health Science Center estimated that texting was the cause for more than 16,000 crash-related deaths between 2001 and 2007.

Two researchers—Jeffrey Coben and Motao Zhu—at West Virginia University have a radical suggestion to end our addiction to driving while cellphoning: by configuring vehicles with devices that would disable mobile phones when the car is in motion.  They argue that federal, state, or local laws are not sufficient when it comes to ending the dangerous practice of distracted driving and that more drastic measures are in order.

Is what they are proposing too extreme? Is it even feasible? Who would foot the bill for the installation of these devices?

Guests:
Jeffrey Coben, MD, Professor in the Departments of Emergency Medicine and Community Medicine at West Virginia University; co-author of the study“Keeping An Eye on Distracted Driving”

Paul Atchley, PhD, Professor and Chair of Undergraduate Studies; Psychology Director, Ph.D. Program in Cognitive Psychology at the University of Kansas

FilmWeek: Oz the Great and Powerful, War Witch, Dead Man Down, and more

$
0
0

The "Journey To OZ Balloon" arriving in Central Park for Disney's "Oz The Great And Powerful" on March 5, 2013 in New York City. Credit: Larry Busacca/Getty Images for Walt Disney Stu

Larry is joined by KPCC film critics Andy Klein, Henry Sheehan, and Charles Soloman to review the week’s new film releases including Oz the Great and Powerful, War Witch, Dead Man Down, and more. TGI-FilmWeek!
 

Oz the Great and Powerful

War Witch

Dead Man Down

Guests:


Andy Klein, film critic for KPCC and the L.A. Times Community Papers chain

Henry Sheehan, film critic for KPCC and dearhenrysheehan.com

Charles Solomon, film critic and animation historian for KPCC, author for amazon.com

 

Mike Tyson on his one-man show, his recovery and his violent past

$
0
0
Mike Tyson Kicks Off Australia Speaking Tour In Brisbane

Mike Tyson speaks on stage during his speaking tour, "Day of the Champions" at the Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre on November 16, 2012 in Brisbane, Australia. Credit: Chris Hyde/Getty Images

Boxing legend Mike Tyson is no longer driven by violence and need to hurt others, at least that’s been the theme of his public life since his last professional match in June 2005, after which he humbly said, “I'm sorry I let everybody down, I'm fighting just to pay my bills. I don't have the stomach for this anymore...I don't have the desire for it. I feel bad for the people...I wish they could get their money back.”

After a career punctuated by pulverizing opponents in the ring and serving time in prison for rape, Tyson’s life after boxing has resembled a never-ending confessional, and no topics (whether it’s sex, addiction, rage, or bankruptcy) are off limits.

So, when Tyson took to the stage in April 2012 on the Las Vegas strip to perform a one-man show about his life, “Mike Tyson: Undisputed Truth,” few were shocked but thousands flocked to see him bare all yet again in his own trademarked blend of soft-spokenness and raw honesty.

Tyson has taken his show on the road, and he starts a three-night stand at the Pantages Theater in Hollywood at 8:00 p.m. tonight, when Angelinos will get to decide if Tyson really is a man transformed or simply a great entertainer.

Interview Highlights:

On why he decided to so a biographical stage show:
"I never thought I wanted to tell my story, but I watched  Chazz Palminteri's "A Bronx Tale" on stage, and he was so magnificent you couldn't believe that he had grasped our attention. The place was packed and you could hear him breathe, and that's how quiet we were. He had us captivated and I wanted to have something to do with that, I wanted to have some of that magic that he had…I wanted to have that kind of performance on people, because when you go see this guy perform, you got your money's worth and then some." 

On how recovery programs changed his life: 
"The best thing to ever happen to me was I got involved with recovery programs. Even though I go through my relapses and stuff, this is the best thing that I can push myself to become a better person. I don't have to be Iron Mike Tyson. I could be Michael Gerard Tyson, I can raise a family and respect my wife and not give her a venereal disease and cheat on her. Iron Mike Tyson can't do that."

On why heavyweight boxing isn't as popular as it used to be:
"That happens in time, they don't have anymore heavyweights they have to go with someone else. There's no American heavyweights that are exciting to that plateau that makes people want to see them. they're not fighting like they really want to hurt people, that's not nice to say in the society that we live is pretty much hyper violent. but that's what makes good fights when people want to hurt each other."

On his violent reputation:
"My whole life was dictated by violence, extreme violence…Regardless of that, I got work for that violence, so it became a narcotic. I really despised that person and tried to erase that person from my memory bank. But that person that I despised was the person that everybody loves and comes to see. Isn't that really weird? I have a really dynamic I have a problem with that, they don't understand as soon as I'm on the stage, they start screaming, but they're not listening to my words...The best audience I've had is when they listen to all my words."

On being sober for 4.5 years:
"It's not really about the drugs, it's about me developing my life, because I would never have been able to develop these life skills — that my father didn't possess that my mother didn't possess — that's why they died the way they died if I never got involved with these recovery problems. They gave me skills that just, once the situation happens they go into affect."

Guest:
Mike Tyson, former undisputed world champion heavyweight boxer who retired with 44 KOs in 58 fights

What would a LACMA takeover of MOCA mean to art in Los Angeles?

$
0
0
Transmission MOCA

Guests walk through spinning spirals in a MOCA exhibit entitled "Transmission L.A." Will LACMA's oversight of MOCA change the L.A. art scene? Credit: Ashley Myers-Turner/KPCC

Whether your taste in art runs contemporary or classical, whimsical or dark, a shake-up in the L.A. art scene could change what you see. Yesterday, the venerable Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) proposed acquiring the troubled Museum of Contemporary Art.

MOCA has enjoyed success with pop and popular exhibitions that Angelenos couldn't find elsewhere in the city - such as last year's Transmission LA. Nevertheless, the museum's leadership has been in tumult. Its board hired New York art dealer Jeffrey Deitch. Ever since, MOCA lost most of curators and board-member artists including L.A.'s beloved John Baldessari and Ed Ruscha. Those losses coupled with continued financial shortfalls make it ripe for LACMA's picking. One potential stopper is powerful philanthropist Eli Broad - a recent $30-million gift he bestowed to MOCA had strings attached.

Would such a merger excite the city's art offerings or could a single vision become boring? Why has MOCA failed to find financiers? What designs does Eli Broad have on the visual-art institutions of L.A.?

Guests:
Christopher Knight, art critic for the Los Angeles Times

Lynn Zelevansky, curator for The Henry J. Heinz II Director of Carnegie Museum of Art, former curator for LACMA, where she organized numerous exhibitions, including Your Bright Future: 12 Contemporary Artists from Korea, the award-winning Beyond Geometry: Experiments in Form, 1940s to 1970s, and Love Forever: Yayoi Kusama.

Los Angeles Harbor Commission approve SCIG rail yard project

$
0
0
A cargo ship stands on Long Beach

A cargo ship stands on Long Beach harbour, California. If the SCIG rail yard project is approved, cargo will be transferred onto freight trains closer to the port. Credit: JOE KLAMAR/AFP/Getty Images

The Los Angeles Harbor Commission yesterday approved the Southern California International Gateway (SCIG), a $500 million rail yard project. This project still needs to be approved by the Los Angeles City Council, but the SCIG has been the center of a big debate.

This project will bring a large new rail yard and trucking depot to the area near the Port of Long Beach. Supporters include numerous politicos and those who advocate for the reported 1,500 new jobs the SCIG would bring to the area. Also, by transferring cargo at the port instead of downtown L.A., there should be less truck traffic on the 710 freeway. But Long Beach residents don’t want fleets of freight trains and trucks constantly rolling in and out of the new site. They say this project will cause health and respiratory illnesses, and environmental groups question if these trucks will really end up being zero- or near-zero-emission.

Can this project by the Port of Long Beach mean less truck traffic and diesel fumes? Will it raise health issues to nearby residents? Do more job opportunities outweigh these concerns?

Guests:
David Pettit, Senior Attorney, Natural Resources Defense Council and director of NRDC's Southern California Air Program

Roger Nober, Executive Vice President of BNSF, the sponsor of the SCIG project

Jumping through hoops to get a job

$
0
0
Walmart hiring

When Walmart was hiring for its Neighborhood Market store in Altadena, California, hundreds of job seekers lined up. With so many applicants per job, how efficient is the hiring process in today's economy? Credit: KPCC

The “Great Recession” that began in 2008 upended the economy and left millions of Americans without jobs. Now, in 2013, as the economy climbs back and the unemployment rate continues to drop, employers have large numbers of qualified candidates from which to choose. But many companies still aren’t rushing to fill vacant positions. Instead, they’re taking a more cautious approach to hiring new labor and counting on existing employees to take on the extra workload.

The result is a growing number of dispirited job hopefuls who are experiencing a new kind of grueling, multi-step interview process and some unorthodox requests. Some candidates have endured eight or more interviews for jobs that may never be filled and spending valuable time and resources on transportation, food, clothing and time trying to get the gig.

What can convince employers to invest in their workforce and fill vacant positions? How can desperate job seekers circumvent or survive the interview gauntlet? Have you been run through the ringer to get a job?

Guest:
Cynthia Shapiro, career strategist and author of “What Does Somebody Have to Do to Get a Job Around Here?” (St. Martin's Griffin 2008)

Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez’s body to be preserved for posterity

$
0
0
Venezuela Chavez

In this photo released by Miraflores Press Office, Nicolas Maduro, Venezuela's acting president, left, Nicaragua's President Daniel Ortega, third from left, and his wife Rosa Murillo, second from left, mourn next to the coffin containing the remains of Venezuela's late President Hugo Chavez during his wake at a military academy. Credit: Uncredited/AP

Venezuela’s government has announced that it plans to embalm the body of recently deceased leader Hugo Chavez, so that it may be displayed in a glass coffin “eternally” and inspire Venezuelans to keep the socialist revolution alive.

Comandante Chavez joins a long line of 20th century world leaders whose remains have achieved immortality.  The first was Soviet Union founder Vladimir Lenin, who died soon after the discovery of Tutankhamen’s tomb and is still on display in Moscow’s Red Square.  Ho Chi Minh and Mao Zedong are two revolutionaries whose corpses receive daily visitors in their respective glass sarcophagi; Joseph Stalin’s body was displayed along with Lenin’s from 1953 to 1961, when it was removed and buried.

But let’s face it – it’s cold in Russia, not so much in Venezuela. Some have speculated that the decision was made too late in Chavez’ case, and that preserving his body to withstand the South American climate is no longer feasible. What extreme measures must be taken to ensure a corpse will survive decades, even centuries?

Why do some political regimes feel the need to keep an embalmed leader above ground?  Is it to remind the people who’s in charge? If a powerful symbol of the movement is needed, would a statue do?   Would you visit the tomb of one of your heroes to see his or her body on display?

Guest:
Nina Tumarkin, Russian Historian and Professor of History, Wellesley College; author of "The Living and the Dead: The Rise and Fall of the Cult of World War II in Russia" and "Lenin Lives! The Lenin Cult in Soviet Russia"


Sheryl Sandberg rocks the boat by leaning in

$
0
0
US Chief Operating Officer of Facebook

"Lean In" author and Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg delivered an address entitled "Women as the Way Forward," during the World Economic Forum (WEF) in the congress center of the Swiss resort of Davos. Credit: VINCENZO PINTO/AFP/Getty Images

In her new book, "Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead," Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg tells women they need to “lean in,” embrace success and self-confidence, take charge of their careers. But the problem is not just women themselves, she says - it’s ingrained societal prejudices. Girls who are assertive are called “bossy,” writes Sandberg, and women who lead in the workplace are seen as aggressive and unlikeable. Despite the gains made by the feminist movement, women are still not making it to the top boardrooms in parity with their male colleagues; they should be forging ahead, acquiring mentors, demanding promotions and shattering stereotypes.

The backlash has been instantaneous.  Critics point out that Sandberg has wealth and privilege on her side, that she has been “lucky” to have powerful men to smooth her way and that she’s balanced career and motherhood with the help of nannies. So how much of a role model can she be?

There’s also the question of whether “leaning in” will make much of a difference as long as corporations continue to be resistant to changes that will enable women to rise to the top. Are Sandberg’s ideas realistic? Should she be using her platform to inspire change in the business climate, rather than in individuals? Fifty years after the birth of the feminist movement, are women still paying a price to climb the corporate ladder? And what about men - will they ever be able to choose family over career, or are they just as trapped in their role of breadwinner?

Guest:
Avivah Wittenberg-Cox, CEO of 20-first, one of the world's leading gender consulting firms, and author of "How Women Mean Business: A Step by Step Guide to Profiting from Gender Balanced Business" (Wiley, 2010)

Brett Singer, formerly worked in public relations, now a stay-at-home dad whose wife is the "breadwinner". He's also the editor of Daddytips.com.

Brown’s proposed Medi-Cal cuts unpopular with California Democrats

$
0
0
Proposed California Budget Cuts Threaten Adult Day Health Care

Program assistant Mayra Dittman (L) helps Juanita Gilbert get up to walk at the Lifelong Medical Marin Adult Day Health Care Center. Centers like Lifelong could be forced to close if California Gov. Jerry Brown's proposed budget cuts were to be approved by the state legislature. Credit: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

As California moves toward implementation of Obamacare in the state, Governor Jerry Brown and Democratic state lawmakers have hit a speed bump in how the state will pay for coverage of the poorest Californians.

Dems in the state house have proposed adding those who make up to $15,415 a year to the roles of Medi-Cal (the state’s version of Medicaid), but Brown has countered, concerned that the state can’t afford it in a time of deep budget cuts. Not only is funding a concern, but who administers the healthcare expansion--the state or counties. Democrats are in favor a state-wide approach, and the governor has yet to pick a side, but needless to say, the Affordable Care Act as a working system is still taking shape in the state.

Do you think it’s wise to add spending to cover the poor in a time when budgets are shrinking? Would you rather see Obamacare administered by the state or local government?

Guests:
Holly Mitchell, Democratic California State Assemblymember; Member of the Assembly Health Committee; Mitchell represents California's 54th District, which stretches from South L.A. to UCLA; the Crenshaw district, Culver City, Ladera Heights, West Adams, Mid-City and Mar Vista.

Dylan Roby, Assistant Professor, Health Services, University of California, Los Angeles; Research Scientist, UCLA Center for Health Policy Research

'Letters to Newtown' and the psychology of grieving online

$
0
0

Photos from "Letters to Newtown" on Tumblr.

In the months since the tragic massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary, Newtown, Conn. has been inundated with gifts and letters from around the world. Mail filled entire warehouses  and memorials cropped up all over town, in front of churches and on people’s lawns. Though many of the larger memorials were taken down not long after the shooting, reminders of the December 14th tragedy remain.

Newtown is not the first incident that has inspired mourning en masse. New York handled a high volume of donations and sentimental letters in the wake of the 9/11 attacks – many other prominent deaths and mass shootings have been followed by an influx of emotional support by mail.

What makes Newtown different? Times are changing. Coverage of the Sandy Hook shooting was fast paced and ubiquitous, the story monopolized news coverage, with details and corrections rolling in for days. The response from those grieving all over the world was just as fast – social media reactions came in at lightning speed, and the volume of mail in the weeks that followed was enormous.

Ross MacDonald, “Mother Jones” contributor and Newtown resident, watched as the town erected and dissembled memorials. The ones built outside the school and a town church were quickly weathered and, according to MacDonald, difficult to face day-to-day for town residents, especially those who lost someone in the shooting. The materials used for the memorials were incinerated – the ashes will be incorporated into a permanent future memorial, but construction may be years off.

Meanwhile, the town continued to receive mail from across the globe, and town officials decided that the letters and gifts would be burned and added to the ashes to be incorporated into the future memorial. MacDonald, who had seen the letters in person, made an appeal – the letters should be saved, documented, kept as folk art.

With support from the town, “Mother Jones,” and blogging site Tumblr Storyboard, MacDonald began to catalog the mail. The town library and the Smithsonian Museum assisted in the archiving process, and volunteers gathered to photograph and scan letters to be uploaded to the project website, Letters to Newtown

“I consider [the letters] historic documents of a historic event, but they’re also part of the healing process to the people here,” MacDonald said on AirTalk. 

The images are heartbreaking and haunting. Some are beautiful pieces of art; many are notes from children expressing their sympathies. The result is a visually compelling and extremely resonant motif of grief.

Just looking at the Letters to Newtown project is enough to trigger the sense of sadness and loss that struck the world after the shooting, but for MacDonald and the others working on the project, the mourning process hit even harder. MacDonald recalls the difficulty of working with the letters for hours each day, how the volunteers cried, and how visibly shaken they became.

“I did not expect to have such a strong reaction to them...” MacDonald said. “It was incredibly powerful.” 

Karen North, Ph.D., a psychologist and expert in online communities at the University of Southern California, says that taking the grief process online can have a powerful effect. For people at the epicenter of a tragedy, like the families of those killed in the Newtown shooting, coming face to face with reminders of the traumatic event can be debilitating. Letters to Newtown is an extensive and readily accessible project, but it’s not in plain view.

“Especially for the people who were personally affected by this tragedy, they now don’t have to go somewhere and be in public in order to look at these kinds of contributions,” North said. “They can sit at home they can look at the messages, they can cry, they can heal, they can develop closure. And years from now they’ll be able to look back on this and remember their loved ones or remember how much love was sent to them from all over the country and all over the world.”

Relegating the grief process to an internet community can be helpful for those who are experiencing the tragedy firsthand. Rather than being forced to confront a memorial on the side of the road or a stranger offering condolences in the supermarket, victims’ families are able to set boundaries for mourning.

But what about the grieving process for the strangers writing from afar? Is their empathy genuine? Is it interpreted as such? North points out that though many contributors to these group mourning projects may be acting out of genuine empathy, they aren’t experiencing anything close to the loss that the immediately affected families feel. 

“We have to remember that while this is sort of a subject of fascination for the rest of us, actual people died and their family members are trying to deal with this very public mourning for their very private experience,” North said. “This will give them places to go to look at the event in years to come as they remember it and want to look back or want to process the information and develop some closure.” 

MacDonald says that in his interactions with representatives for the victims’ families, reaction to the archiving project has been positive – those who have been most intensely impacted feel that the letters show support, and want them preserved. MacDonald says that one family member told him that some of the families are doing their own, smaller versions of Letters to Newtown. 

“All of the mail that’s addressed to the families goes directly to them,” MacDonald said. “They go once a week to the post office, pick up the boxes of mail, photograph and scan the stuff that they think is worth passing on to everyone and then they send out a mass email to the extended family.”

Online grieving is not unique to large-scale tragedy. Social media has changed the way many people mourn. Dealing with traumatic events such as serious illness, injury, or loss has come to include difficult online announcements, handling the virtual footprint left behind by a lost loved one, and coping with the fallout on social media.

North suggests that while opening oneself up to condolences via the internet breaks down some potentially-helpful privacy barriers, networks like Twitter and Facebook can also be helpful for those who are mourning a serious loss. It eases the spread of news – friends and acquaintances are more likely to have heard about a death or traumatic life event, sparing the grieving party many awkward explanations. 

Status updates can also be an asset; simple updates can alert others to the fact that someone may be moving on from the place where a trauma overwhelms their life.

Have you dealt with the grief process online? Do you prefer privacy while you mourn, or can the support of an online community be beneficial? Is group grief a natural impulse? Is it healthy?

Guests:
Ross MacDonald, Mother Jones contributor and creator of the Letters to Newtown project

Karen North, Ph.D., Director, Annenberg Program on Online Communities, USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism; psychologist specializing in online communities

Judge blocks New York soda ban

$
0
0
New York City Board Of Health Approves Bloomberg's Over Sized Sugary Drink Ban

Jasmine Batista displays a 21-ounce soda she purchased at McDonalds in Manhattan after the New York City Board of Health voted to ban the sale of large sugary drinks at restaurants and concessions on September 13, 2012 in New York City. Credit: Mario Tama/Getty Images

A judge in New York has put the kibosh on the Bloomberg administration's attempt to ban the sale of super-sized sugary drinks at certain outlets and restaurants, one day before the prohibition was to go into effect. The soda ban was approved by New York City's Health Department a year ago, which argued that the action was necessary to lower the city's 58 percent obesity rate.

But the move was met with fierce opposition from industry groups as well as some peeved consumers, saying that people have the right to choose what they want to buy or eat. One thing’s for sure, the issue isn't going away anytime soon. New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, which spearheaded the soda ban, cited statistics suggesting that 70,000 people across the nation and 5,000 in New York City die from obesity every year.

Is legislation the best way to help people make informed choices about their health? If not, is price control a better way? Is putting a graphic advisory, a la cigarette packages in countries like Canada or England, the way to go? What's the most effective way to help consumers make the decision to kick certain bad habits themselves?

Guest:
Dr. Peter Ubel, physician and behavioral scientist who specializes in healthy policy and economics; Professor of Business Administration and Medicine & Professor of Public Policy, Duke University

Are online reviews trustworthy? (Poll)

$
0
0

One sign that a restaurant review is a fake is if it gives a very high or very low rating without many specifics. Credit: Flickr/Jason Garber Creative Commons

If you own a business, you know how important word of mouth is. As consumers, we are making more and more of our purchasing decisions based on what other consumers say...and not what advertisers tell us.

Many websites have sprung up to meet those needs, providing consumer reviews on everything from restaurants to hotels to local services. A 2012 report from market research firm Nielsen found that 70 percent of consumers said they trust online reviews, a 15% increase from 2009.

Do you trust and use online reviews wh…

But the ecosystem is rife for abuse. Stories abound of unscrupulous companies and manufacturers paying people to write rosy reviews.  And one researcher says as many of 30 percent of all reviews online could be fake. So who can we trust as consumers? How can we sniff out bogus reviews? What are consumer review sites doing about this growing problem?

Guests:
Bing Liu, Professor, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago

Adam Medros , Vice President of Global Product at TripAdvisor

Viewing all 9870 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images